RIASSUNTO
Ecosystem approach to fisheries requires a thorough understanding of fishing impacts on ecosystem status and processes as well as predictive tools such as ecosystem models to provide useful information for management. The credibility of such models is essential when used as decision making tools, and model fitting to observed data is one major criterion to assess such credibility. However, more attention has been given to the exploration of model behavior than to a rigorous confrontation to observations, as the calibration of ecosystem models is challenging in many ways. First, ecosystem models can only be simulated numerically and are generally too complex for mathematical analysis and explicit parameter estimation; secondly, the complex dynamics represented in ecosystem models allow species-specific parameters to impact other species parameters through ecological interactions; thirdly, critical data about non-commercial species are often poor; lastly, technical aspects can be impediments to the calibration with regard to the high computational cost potentially involved and the scarce documentation published on fitting complex ecosystem models to data. This work highlights some issues related to the confrontation of complex ecosystem models to data and proposes a methodology for a sequential multi-phases calibration of ecosystem models. We propose criteria to classify the parameters of a model: model dependency and time variability of the parameters. These criteria and the availability of approximate initial estimates are used as decision rules to determine which parameters need to be estimated, and their precedence order in the sequential calibration process. The end-to-end ecosystem model ROMS-PISCES-OSMOSE applied to the Northern Humboldt Current Ecosystem is used as an illustrative case study.
Comment: 33 pages, 4 tables, 13 figures, 2 appendices